China has been chasing nuclear fusion since the 1950s, gradually shifting to the tokamak design that dominates the field today. The country now runs the EAST (Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak) and is building two flagship machines: the massive CFETR (China Fusion Engineering Test Reactor) and the compact BEST (Compact Fusion Energy Experiment) – a 40 % smaller, three‑times higher‑density version of ITER that started assembly in May 2025 and should be finished by 2027. These projects have lifted China into the world’s top tier of fusion research, especially in building large‑scale facilities. Breakthroughs include producing world‑leading superconducting wires (up from kilogram‑scale to tons per year) and achieving “dual‑hundred‑million‑degree” plasma in CFETR, a first for any operating device. EAST set a record in early 2025 by holding 100 million‑degree plasma for 1,066 seconds, proving long‑pulse operation is possible. While ITER remains the flagship international experiment, it still faces hurdles such as tritium self‑sufficiency and radiation‑resistant materials. China’s contribution covers about 10 % of ITER’s components but 30 % of its core technology, and its parts are consistently delivered on time. Optimists now eye commercial fusion power around 2045, a timeline that hinges on solving ITER’s remaining challenges and building a DEMO‑type reactor after ITER’s completion. Despite delays—ITER’s first plasma has slipped from a 2020 target to 2035—the consensus is that no insurmountable barrier remains, and a breakthrough in fusion energy is on the horizon.
Read more
A team of researchers has taken a fresh look at how artificial‑intelligence chatbots talk to each other, and the results are surprisingly blunt. Instead of forcing AI agents to wait for their turn and respond with perfectly polite, pre‑written replies, the scientists let the bots speak sentence by sentence, interrupt one another, and even stay silent when they choose. By giving each model a personality drawn from the classic "big five" traits—openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism—the agents could act more like real people, cutting in, cutting off, or waiting as the conversation demanded. The experiment compared three setups: a fixed speaking order, a dynamic order, and a dynamic order with interruptions enabled. In the latter case, the bots calculated an "urgency score" that let them decide in real time whether to jump in. This more chaotic, human‑like interaction turned out to boost performance on complex reasoning problems, beating standard, turn‑taking language models by a noticeable margin. Lead author Yuichi Sei says the goal was to add the messy social cues we take for granted in everyday talk, and the study shows that giving AI agents a bit of rudeness can actually make them smarter.
Read more